• Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← Make me an LGBT sandwich, hold the L. And the T.
MGTOW Out Loud →

Amanda Marcotte on the Thomas Ball suicide, and MRA haters

 June 27, 2011
  · 436 Comments

Amanda Marcotte, feminist blogger and Friend of Man Boobz, has been taking a lot of shit from MRAs – and I mean a LOT of shit – for a comment she made here on the Thomas Ball suicide.

As you may already know, Ball burned himself to death outside a New Hampshire courthouse. In a lengthy manifesto he wrote shortly before killing himself, he portrayed his suicide as a protest against a corrupt family court system, and went on to argue that MRAs should quite literally assemble some Molotov cocktails and “start burning down police stations and courthouses.” (You can read the whole manifesto here.)  Despite his calls for violence many MRAs have hailed him as an MRA martyr.

Marcotte, in her comment here, suggested that there might have been other, more personal reasons for his suicide – namely, the desire to hurt his ex-wife:

I’ll point out that setting yourself on fire is an extremely effective tool if your goal is to make your ex-wife’s life a living hell, and if your anger at losing control over her overwhelms all other desires. Which is common enough with abusers, who will ruin their own lives and their own shit and turn their children against them in an effort to hurt the woman they’ve fixated on.

One MR blogger declared this comment “pure feminist evil”; a conservative blogger compared Marcotte to the Beast of Babylon.  Still other MRAs resorted to assorted variations on the c-word.

Marcotte has now responded to this, er, “criticism” with an excellent post on Pandagon. As she points out, correctly,

suicide and threats of suicide are common tactics used by abusers to hurt their victims. Abusers dramatically self-destruct all the time in their desperation to control and hurt the objects of their obsession.  There was just recently a big story about this, in fact: Jason Valdez of Utah, who had a long criminal record that included domestic violence, held a woman hostage in a hotel room for 16 hours and kept updates about the situation on Facebook. He eventually committed suicide.

The notion that suicide can be a hostile, aggressive act designed to hurt other people is hardly a controversial one, whether the person committing suicide is male or female. Threats of suicide are often used to manipulate other people; suicide itself can be an act of revenge.

Marcotte goes on:

Apparently, I’m supposed to pretend that suicide isn’t a disruptive, selfish act in many cases (especially when the suicide victim commits it in a public and destructive way), and that people who do it, while yes victims of their own mental health problems, are also thinking that they’re going to make everyone pay for not indulging them.  In fact, not only is this true in Ball’s case, but he spelled it out in his suicide note.  The “make the bastards suffer” theme of his note is the reason that wingnuts are supporting him.

But you don’t have to take her word for it. Read Ball’s entire manifesto, to the end, and ask yourself if this man is an appropriate “martyr” for any political movement.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: antifeminism, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, threats, violence against men/women
← Make me an LGBT sandwich, hold the L. And the T.
MGTOW Out Loud →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. 8
  11. 9
  12. »
  1. Magical Laura says:
    June 28, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    “I’ve been concerned over the years with what I believe is a fairly small martyr impulse in feminism, especially in literary feminisms around Virginia Woolf and Sylvia Plath–an impulse toward making them martyrs of the patriarchy.”

    I didn’t mean to come across in this way, if I did! I guess I find it hard not to connect how I feel when I read the letter, obviously I’m very vain! I don’t think suicide should be used to further a political point or anything.

    Reply
  2. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    *BIG BIG BIG BIG BIG HUGS to everybody on the hugs* 🙁 This is a sad topic, and you guys are awesome :] also awesome is the interesting discussions that break out when the trolls aren’t around! (i love how they still need to troll tho xD they can’t join in.. they need to non sequitur in and call us hateful and stuff xD )

    Suicide is a sensitive personal topic to me too : And I dun rly have much to add to it : I think for THIS situation, Amused got it spot on… it was a political act, and he clearly does hope to manipulate and change minds using an emotional reaction to a gruesome sudden death (this doesn’t mean the cause is evil or nething btw, ppl do this for other things as Amused points out) : (also that’s true, he did basically say his daughter caused it >_> )

    I dunno how to define “selfish” for suicide, b/c doesn’t that imply that ppl SHOULD live for other ppl? That we have a right to their lives, and I understand all our lives interact w/ each other, but it’s not fair to expect ppl who are rly miserable to do things just cuz we’d be sad or even crushed otherwise : And this isn’t to say ppl who are rly depressed wanting to commit suicide (or who do) are thinking clearly or nething… I just mean that in terms of the definition of “selfish” :

    I’ve heard other things get called selfish too… doing “immoral” things your family doesn’t want… I dun want to bring this to trans ppl or queer ppl or nething cuz I dun want this to be a trope w/ me xD and I dun want to make it seem like I’m thinking ONLY of this the whole time (I was actually thinking of my own attempts), I just thought it was kinda relevant… trans ppl get called selfish a lot for the same reasons… we’re hurting the ones we love… we don’t understand the pain we’re putting them thru… we’re robbing them of a “brother”/”husband”/”daughter”/”sister” etc : and “it’s not fair to us” and etc :

    and what if somebody rly does want to kill themselves b/c they’re in so much pain?: I mean I am glad retroactively that I survived and that there WAS a way to happiness (that I didn’t know existed, which is why I thought it was hopeless) but maybe there isn’t for others? or it’s just not what they want? : that’s not to say it’s right or wrong : I have no real opinion for what’s ethical or not on this (except my strong views on body autonomy, well you know >_>) just… is it fair to say that ppl live for US? Like as I said, I know that we all are connected, but if somebody doesn’t want to live for us, can we say “you’re hurting me, i want you alive” or “i want you not to do this or that” …

    maybe it’s the word selfish, b/c I mean any time we do things to our own bodies, for ourselves, it’s “Selfish”, but selfish in our society generally means it’s bad, that we’re not considering others when we SHOULD and I dunno if that’s fair since as MUCH as other ppl may love us, they’re also not living our lives… as I always tell my doctors and psychs who have tried to block my transition or etc in the past… “when this appointment is over, you go on to the next, and then you go home and back to your life… and I have to live w/ my body… I have to live w/ the consequences of what YOU want for me… it’s my body, and my life that you don’t have to live, and you can just forget about when this is over.. I can’t.”

    (this isn’t btw talking about ppl who use threats of suicide to manipulate others, and I def do agree that some ppl who DO commit suicide also have ideas of “this will show them” or etc : in theory isn’t it also selfish to kill yourself if you think it’ll make ppl happy? cuz you’re also deciding for them what makes htem happy : also I was thinking, that at least for my first attempt, part of the thinking was also “finally I’ll have some control over my life and body”.. control over how I die, when I die… and yeah a side effect is also control over ppl you know… that they’ll finally realize how depressed you rly are, or maybe how much they’ll miss you.. or i dunno : i dun like going back to that dark place and trying to figure out what I was thinking 🙁 )

    sry for the ramble and I hope I did not tromp on nebody’s toes or offend nebody : you’re all so wonderful and I dun want to add to a convo only to hurt everybody 🙁 just these are always thoughts I have when it comes to stuff like this and esp suicide 🙁

    Reply
  3. ithiliana says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    Magical Laura: Oh, no, you didn’t! I just saw the letter from Woolf, and was reminded of that group–I’m not sure if that is still out there as much as I saw then, back in the 1990s, or if I’m just not seeing it any more. It wasn’t anything anybody here said.

    The thing with Plath and Woolf is that they were both such brilliant writers, that it was easy to be drawn in. It’s complicated, and I didn’t express it very well, but it wasn’t about your comment, or the others I saw.

    Reply
  4. unreal man says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    @ David
    “I don’t presume to know what is in the head of every person who contemplates, or attempts, or succeeds at, suicide. I do know that suicide and suicide threats CAN be used in an aggressive, manipulative way.”

    Exactly. And it’s a little more of “I don’t presume to know” that we need here. There are too many people who just come out and judge others. As for suicide threats, you’re totally right. Only people seem to equate them with actual suicide. And that is not the same thing at all.

    Also, especially when it comes to something as personal as suicide, we all have very individual possible reasons for doing something like that. How can we not know that we’re projecting our own potential motivations onto somebody else? Just because committing suicide would be a selfish act to you, does not mean that others have the same mindset.

    And we should also pay attention to another matter. Suicide is one thing, setting yourself on fire and “calmly” sitting down, burning to death is not exactly typical suicide. I can only speak for myself here that I cannot imagine doing that ever and I cannot imagine the desperation someone has have to make them do that. And to demand that such a person care about other people’s feelings whilst denying him any sympathy reeks of unconscious privilege.

    If you want to judge other people’s behavior fairly, then try by assuming you’re not special, that you could also get into such a situation and that not understanding their actions means that you don’t understand their situation.

    Reply
  5. Bee says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:24 pm

    duncan: “Suicide isnt something thats used as a revenge tool”

    Except when it is, of course.

    Reply
  6. VoiP says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:25 pm

    Mr. Ball killed himself because he was facing imprisonment on felony child support arrears charges.
    Do any of you hate-filled monsters get it?
    FATHERS ARE GOING TO PRISON (NOT JAIL) FOR MANY YEARS BECAUSE THEY LOSE THEIR JOBS.

    Wasn’t Ball a veteran with a pension? Why yes he was. Perfectly capable of supporting his children–had he wanted to.

    But unfortunately for the Marcottes and Futrelles of the world, justice will eventually triumph. The uber-feminist state that criminializes maleness and seeks to enslave ordinary men cannot stand forever. The worm is already beginning to turn. The hatred and vitriol of women like Amanda Marcotte, and the despicable men who support them, will make no difference in the end.

    See, this is interesting and I hope you’ll stick around to expand on this. Just how, exactly, will this happen? It’s one thing to say “justice will eventually triumph,” but how will you bring that about?

    Property damage? Armed revolt? (Like in Ball’s suicide manifesto–which, incidentally, vitiates the above claims that his suicide was motivated by pain and nothing more) How will that influence anyone, considering that we have police and military forces here and even the best-armed vigilante groups are really nothing in comparison.

    Are you going to form pressure groups to influence lawmaking? Protests? I mean, feminists had to do a whole lot of protesting and lobbying and crap before we got to where we are, so if you want to undo what they’ve done it’s going to take at least as much effort.

    And then what? I mean, you say that “the worm is beginning to turn” and the “hatred” of all your many enemies will “make no difference in the end”–hollow threats I’d be reluctant to put in the mouth of one of my villains in a Seventh Sea game, but let’s assume for the sake of argument that everyone here can write well. So what will the world look like after you’ve won? Will Ms. Marcotte and Mr. Futrelle no longer be allowed to blog, will they be arrested, what? What happens to people who disagree with you? How will men and women interact? How will things function?

    Reply
  7. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:27 pm

    I always wonder… do they think Marcotte and Futrelle ACTUALLY run feminism and have power or something? (hence my magyc cards xD )

    Reply
  8. Schala says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    “The problem with the word ‘selfish’ is that we tend to link it to assholes who only care about themselves. But even people who are generally considerate of other people are capable of the odd selfish act. When you consider the fallout from most suicides- there is almost always someone left devasted or grief-stricken or even just guilt-stricken- how can it be anything other than a selfish act?”

    By this logic, men who die in wars who were conscripted, are selfish and their wives and children are “the biggest victims of war ~ comment by Hillary Clinton”. No seriously…saying it’s selfish to end your life on your own…that’s so 1980s.

    Reply
  9. Schala says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:35 pm

    Let’s say men who choose to enroll, and/or who didn’t dodge the draft.

    Reply
  10. dan says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:36 pm

    Ami

    No, it’s the Rothchilds, those fucking Bavarian upstarts, who run feminism.

    Reply
  11. Jules says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:41 pm

    @Schala

    I don’t thing the two are similar. In my opinion, it’s totally different to work at a profession where there is a risk to your life than it is to physically end your life. I think Euthanasia is different too as I said above.

    I do want to emphasise that I don’t think trying to kill yourself makes you a bad person, just a desperate one.

    Reply
  12. VoiP says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:46 pm

    @Daran

    I only skimmed much of his diatribe, so it’s possible that he expressed anger toward or a desire for revenge against her in another part of it. But if he did, you or Marcotte should be able to cite it with specificity. I should not have to carefully read all ten thousand words and try to guess what it is you think supports your position.

    Hold up. You’re admitting to not having read the text that you’re cherry-picking for quotes? How do you expect that to be persuasive?

    @unreal man

    And it’s a little more of “I don’t presume to know” that we need here. There are too many people who just come out and judge others.

    Except we have access to his point of view as expressed in his manifesto. We know at least some of what he was thinking because he wrote it. As Pecunium said, choosing to disregard what he wrote while maintaining that we can’t know what he thought is disingenuous:

    What I see your, “we should remain open minded and non judgemental” doing is giving an excuse to not take the tone (and I read it all) of his manifesto into account.

    Not to mention that you guys are trying to have it both ways: Daran pays attention to the manifesto when it makes Ball look like a martyr to The System, but when it’s about seeing whether or not he was angry at his ex, then suddenly y’all have no idea how to interpret texts.

    Reply
  13. Toysoldier says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    Bee wrote:

    But if you read Amanda’s comment and her blog post, she never says that she knows.

    Actually, she does. She never states that she is expressing her opinion. Rather she presents her opinion as fact while mocking Ball for killing himself and making fact-free assumptions. That is a fairly horrible thing to do.

    and he never takes blame for hitting her three times in the face, until she was bleeding.

    He did not state that he hit her three times. He stated, “While putting my four year old daughter to bed, she began licking my hand. After giving her three verbal warnings I slapped her. She got a cut lip.”

    He never takes the blame for anything, and that leaves us with the idea that he believes his ex-wife and daughter — along with several government officials, named and unnamed — are at fault for at least some of his desperate suicidal state.

    It is true that he never takes the blame for anything, but it is untrue that he blames his ex-wife or daughter. He never specifically states that, nor does he imply it. All of his blame is placed on the shoulders of the judicial system.

    But Amanda’s opinion is definitely not coming out of nowhere.

    That much is true, although that opinion appears to come from a place of bigotry, sexism, and perverse satisfaction over someone’s suicide, which may be part of her basic character (or lack thereof), but most likely stems from her political views .

    More disturbing is the willingness by feminists to dehumanize this man and enjoy his suicide like some bizarre masturbatory exercise, which only serves to demonstrate the bias that Ball wrote about. It is unlikely that Ball randomly decided to do this. It is more likely that he has hinted at this or demonstrated a propensity for self-harm before, which begs the question why no one bothered to step in.

    David Futrelle wrote:

    I do know that suicide and suicide threats CAN be used in an aggressive, manipulative way. That’s all I’ve claimed here.

    You gave an instance of someone threatening suicide to get you to do what they want. Ball actually killed himself. That is the example you need to provide: an example of a person killing himself to manipulate his spouse, ex, or his family to get what he wants.

    Reply
  14. Pecunium says:
    June 28, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    VoiP: Wasn’t Ball a veteran with a pension? Why yes he was. Perfectly capable of supporting his children–had he wanted to.

    And no, he wasn’t. He had earned a pension, by serving 20+ years in the Reserves, but reserve pensions are different from Active Duty Pensions.

    1: They are pro-rated. Each duty period = 1 point. Points are multiplied by a fractional number, based on one’s pay-grade at retirement. That multiplier is designed to make it so that on gets the equivalent of half one’s pay-grade times the number of days in service. The highest total number of points one can get is 365. If one gets 365 x 20 one gets the same pension one would have gotten if one had done 20 years active.

    The default pension based on 20 years x 60 points =1200 (that’s based on points earned for drill participation, and Annual Training)

    If we assume he was an E6 (Staff Sergeant, probably the most common rank at 20 years, though in the Reserves things are different, and lower ranks are more common than in the Active Component, where has to make E6 to be allowed to stay in past 16 years) that would equal a monthly pension payment of $282.00. before taxes.

    If we figure that schools, Initial Entry Training, etc. would add an extra 200 points to the average service member we get $329.00, before taxes.

    2: Reserve Component pensions are delayed. One gets them at age 60.

    Ball was not that old. He was not receiving a military pension.

    Reply
  15. Toysoldier says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    Except we have access to his point of view as expressed in his manifesto./blockquote>

    Accessing what Ball thought should not involve making up information or contorting what he wrote to fit your views. This goes for both feminists and men’s activists. You should read what is there and take at face value because there is no other information. In this case, he stated that he killed himself over the bias in the family court and criminal court system. Since we have no further information, there is no reason to assume he killed himself over anything else, let alone that he did it specifically specifically to spite his ex-wife.

    Reply
  16. VoiP says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    <>
    I’m sorry. Thank you for the clarification.

    Reply
  17. Pecunium says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    Toysoldier: It is true that he never takes the blame for anything, but it is untrue that he blames his ex-wife or daughter. He never specifically states that, nor does he imply it.

    He does imply it. He implies that his wife caused it all by calling the mental health professional for advice. He implies that if she had just ignore that he hit his four year old daugher in the face for licking him, none of this would have happened.

    WHile he doesn’t say, in the suicide letter, how many times he hit her, it’s in other evidence.

    That much is true, although that opinion appears to come from a place of bigotry, sexism, and perverse satisfaction over someone’s suicide,

    Citation needed. You want to say that nowhere in the Ball’s writing is any of the things Marcotte is inferring directly said, then you either have to show specfic statements which are textualy, “bigotry, sexism and perverse satisfaction over someone’s suicide.” Otherwise you are a demonstrable hypocrite.

    Reply
  18. VoiP says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:10 pm

    Sorry: the above apology went to Pecunium for the explanation of Ball’s military status and benefits.

    Toysoldier:

    She never states that she is expressing her opinion. Rather she presents her opinion as fact while mocking Ball for killing himself and making fact-free assumptions. That is a fairly horrible thing to do.

    Where in what she wrote do you see her ‘mocking Ball”? Please provide a quote from what she actually wrote, and evidence for your claim that she is motivated by “bigotry, sexism, and perverse satisfaction over someone’s suicide.”
    Here’s the article:
    http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/wingnut_bloggers_rally_behind_a_violent_call_for_revolution

    More disturbing is the willingness by feminists to dehumanize this man and enjoy his suicide like some bizarre masturbatory exercise, which only serves to demonstrate the bias that Ball wrote about.

    Who is writing this? All feminists? Please provide quotes, with context, otherwise this claim looks even weaker than your first one.

    He did not state that he hit her three times. He stated, “While putting my four year old daughter to bed, she began licking my hand. After giving her three verbal warnings I slapped her. She got a cut lip.”

    This hardly makes him look better. if you’re quibbling over how many times a grown man hit a child, in the assumption that one of those answers will exonerate him, you have already missed the point.

    Reply
  19. VoiP says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    I posted, thought it didn’t stick, then posted the same thing again. Please remove the first one; the second one’s better written.

    Reply
  20. Pecunium says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    VoiP: No problem. Reserve Component Pensions are really complex. Honestly, I just covered the most simple aspects of someone who had a straightforward career in nothing but one branch of the reserves.

    We didn’t touch “good years” deployments, highest grade satisfactorily held, Disability Compensation, mixed time, mixed branch… M-Day time credits against AGR retirement…

    And don’t even get me started on the unfairness of “Gray Retirement”, and the ways in which being in the Reserves is screwed up in the terms of the pension delay; and how complicated it is to deal with… because of prejudices, and the hypotheticals on ways someone could game the the system.

    Reply
  21. VoiP says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    Accessing what Ball thought should not involve making up information or contorting what he wrote to fit your views. This goes for both feminists and men’s activists. You should read what is there and take at face value because there is no other information.

    Then you should be able to provide citations for your claims about Marcotte.

    Also, as Pecunium said:

    He does imply it. He implies that his wife caused it all by calling the mental health professional for advice. He implies that if she had just ignore that he hit his four year old daugher in the face for licking him, none of this would have happened.

    Reply
  22. SarBear says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:17 pm

    FATHERS ARE GOING TO PRISON (NOT JAIL) FOR MANY YEARS BECAUSE THEY LOSE THEIR JOBS.

    Anthony Z, women do jail time just the same for getting behind on payments.

    Reply
  23. bekabot says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:18 pm

    Thank you, Amused, for implying what I am now going to state; which is that Thomas Ball was a cold-blooded guy. He didn’t immolate himself because he was having a bad day or because his back teeth hurt or because he owed child support. He immolated himself because he wanted to make a point, and because, after he’d systematically weighed up all his options, he came to the conclusion that setting himself on fire was his best option for the making of that point. He gambled well because he had the temperament of a card-counter from the start. When he figured that he’d lit on a tactic no one would be able to ignore, he was right. The proof is that we’re talking about it now.

    I recognize cold-bloodedness because I’m cold-blooded myself.* I understand how people who do this sort of thing think. I’d never imitate them, because I am the shy retiring type and because I labor under a deficiency of testosterone, but I realize that behavior of this sort is meant, by the people who engage in it, to serve a linguistic purpose. It’s in the nature of an argument. It’s a way of getting the last word. Some of the MRA/MGTOW-ers who have commented on Thomas Ball’s suicide have likened his actions to those of Joseph Stack. I think that they’re onto something when they notice the parallel. Joseph Stack set his house on fire and flew his plane into the IRS headquarters at Austin not to escape pain or to punish people (this is the issue on which I disagree with Amanda Marcotte) or because voices in his head were driving him on, but because he wanted to gain a readership for his manifesto. He had complaints about his life and he wanted others to know what they were. Like Thomas Ball, he picked a public place from which to stage his exit, and like Thomas Ball, he chose a method of a kind which would pretty much be guaranteed to cause the phrase “blaze of glory” to pass through the minds of the sort of people he wanted to impress. In other words, both men knew their audience and were playing to it.**

    I think Amanda Marcotte has made a mistake, though I don’t think she’s made any of the mistakes she’s been accused of making here. What Amanda Marcotte got wrong is: she has overestimated the importance of the woman in the case. Thomas Ball did not commit suicide in order to get back at his wife. Thomas Ball burnt himself up in order to communicate his disgust with the rest of the world to the rest of the world, in an articulate and understandable manner. His wife and kids were a part of the sum total of the means by which he hoped to achieve that, but they were not the reason for it, nor was his message aimed at them (other than incidentally). Like Stack, he wanted to publicize his woes, and his wife and kids alone would not have comprised a large enough audience. Another thing that some of the MRA/MGTOW-ers who have posted here have mentioned is that Ball doesn’t spend too much time talking about his wife or his family in his suicide-screed. There’s a reason for that. Ball’s wife and family hold the position of the parts of speech in his aggregate message; he uses them to help get his point across. But his self-immolation was never about them.

    (It’s natural for straight women who have been involved with men to think that men’s behavior hinges more on women’s reactions than it in fact does. What can I say? Female vanity is a monster.)

    *Here’s the proof: the first thing I thought after reading Joseph Stack’s suicide note–although really, like Thomas Ball’s similar production, it’s too long and involved to be described as a “note”–was: “Air-mail delivery: postage too high and letter too long.” The first thing I thought after seeing a picture of the New Hampshire courthouse in front of which Ball lit himself up was: “They’re going to be a long time scrubbing out that stain.”

    **Joseph Stack’s daughter, who might be expected to know a thing or two about her Dad, recognized that what her father was after. She realized that his primary goal was to be listened to. When asked about her suicide (before she walked back her own comments) she said that (in effect) she thought her father was a hero because he’d got the public’s attention. True story.

    Reply
  24. Bee says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:25 pm

    Toysoldier:

    Actually, she does. She never states that she is expressing her opinion. Rather she presents her opinion as fact while mocking Ball for killing himself and making fact-free assumptions. That is a fairly horrible thing to do.

    She doesn’t use the words “my opinion,” but it’s fairly clear that she’s expressing her opinion. Again: “I was annoyed by all this and suggested in the comments at Man Boobz that there might be a more personal reason for this guy’s suicide, and pointed out that suicide and threats of suicide are common tactics used by abusers to hurt their victims.”

    “I pointed out in Man Boobz’s comments that setting yourself on fire is an extremely effective way to hurt your ex-wife, if that’s your goal, and perhaps MRAs could consider that aspect of this.”

    Where does she say “This is fact!”?

    He did not state that he hit her three times.

    Wrong. Ball admitted striking his daughter three times with an open hand across her face, but maintained it was “appropriate discipline,” the court documents said.

    it is untrue that he blames his ex-wife or daughter. He never specifically states that, nor does he imply it.

    But no. He does imply it. What do you think “My story starts with the infamous slapping incident” is supposed to be? Or this: “Almost two years after the incident, I was talking with her on the phone. She told me that night she had called a mental health provider we had for one of the kids. Wendy, the counselor told my then wife that if she did not call the police on me, then she too would be arrested. Suddenly, everything made sense. She is the type that believes that people in authority actually know what they are talking about.”? It seems pretty clear that he’s blaming his daughter for starting the story by licking him and causing him to slap her, and that he’s blaming his wife for foolishly believing people in authority. And then he goes on to blame the state and the feds, but really, by not taking any responsibility for slapping his daughter in the first place, he never takes the blame off of his daughter and ex-wife. Secondarily blaming the government doesn’t do that. And anyway, the government doesn’t care what he has to say, isn’t going to feel guilty for his death. Who is?

    although that opinion appears to come from a place of bigotry, sexism, and perverse satisfaction over someone’s suicide, which may be part of her basic character (or lack thereof), but most likely stems from her political views.

    Or from the same basic place my position is coming from, which is a genuine sympathy for Ball and his family, and a concern about Ball’s call to action and the MRM’s adoption of said call and Ball as a martyr figure to fuel it. I can’t speak for Amanda, but you’re dead wrong if you read a perverse satisfaction over someone’s suicide into either her words or mine.

    Reply
  25. law1204 says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    I took Abnormal Psychology in college. We studied suicide, and the explanations for it fall into three categories: Psychodynamic (suicide results from depression and/or other emotional states), sociocultural (suicide is influenced by how attached a person is to social groups, an influential view often supported by research), and biological (suicide is linked to either genetic factors, brain factors such as low serotonin, or use of certain drugs).

    Obviously when studying any particular case of suicide there can be overlap; in this instance there isn’t any evidence to suggest anything outside the sociocultural view. The sociocultural view further breaks suicide down into three subcategories – Egoistic suicides (suicides committed by people over whom society has little or no control – such people are not concerned with societal norms nor are they integrated into the social fabric ie, they are isolated or alienated), altruistic suicides (people who are so well integrated that they intentionally sacrifice their lives for its well being), and anomic suicides (people whose social environment fails to provide stable structures).

    We can really only guess which one (or more) of the above categories Ball felt more like he fit into; let it be said, however, that suicides that are sometimes characterized as altrustic (suicide bombers) are not seen that way by many theorists. “Suicide bombers seem indifferent to the innocent lives they are destroying and categorize the bombers as mass murderers motivated by hatred rather than feelings of altruism (Humphrey 2006).”

    Since I have been out of college for awahile I haven’t bothered with the appropriate attributions for the above. It was all taken from Comer 7th ed. pages 320 – 324 lest anyone get upset with me for inappropriate use.

    I thought I’d put all the psychological thought out there just in case it helped. Ball was a criminal and a child abuser. People are still responsible for their own behavior at the end of the day and no psychological diagnoses mitigates that. And at the end of the day should the victims of someone’s crime be expected to care about the criminal’s life tribulations if any? Should everyone expected to have sympathy for whatever led a criminal to commit whatever crimes they committed? Plenty of other criminals in rare moments of truthfulness have admitted from behind the cold bars of a jail cell that they did it because they could. They’ll use other excuses given to them to avoid punishment, not because those excuses are true.

    Anyway, just saying that suicide can, in fact, be motivated by hatred, revenge, control, and abuse, not necessarily pain or depression…I see no evidence of depression in Ball’s note, his suicide was the delusional “political” statement of a man with no empathy (his dismissal of what he did to his daughter is of particular note, and most of what he said was almost completely about his own “victimization” at the hands of the law – it’s a great snapshot of pure narcissism). Abusers abuse because they feel entitled to, and they buck the law and social convention because of personal entitlement (Bancroft). The only thing I’d believe about Ball is that he might have had APD (an official diagnosis of which won’t even get you out of the death penalty), as many abusers do (Dutton). He was a man who belonged behind bars as, despite whatever was wrong with him and his motivations, he was a danger to society and it was really only the best of fortune that he didn’t take his wife and children with him.

    Reply
  26. VoiP says:
    June 28, 2011 at 4:35 pm

    *Here’s the proof: the first thing I thought after reading Joseph Stack’s suicide note–although really, like Thomas Ball’s similar production, it’s too long and involved to be described as a “note”–was: “Air-mail delivery: postage too high and letter too long.” The first thing I thought after seeing a picture of the New Hampshire courthouse in front of which Ball lit himself up was: “They’re going to be a long time scrubbing out that stain.”

    Yes, and in my deepest heart of hearts I am an anime antihero with a giant gun, a mysterious past, a chill air of aloofness (that can be overcome by a Woman Who Understands Me) and a trench coat like Neo from the Matrix. Whadda ya mean nobody else gives a damn?

    Reply
  27. duncan macleod says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:04 pm

    you know the disturbing part …… all the focus by feminists seems to be on the idea that the ex wifes life was made hell why ?? she is his ex wife, the only life of interest is the childs, using this as a way of turning a woman into a victim is an innefective tool and somewhat offensive.

    Reply
  28. Pecunium says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    duncan macleod: No, the “feminists” have been talking about what they see as his motives/actions. It’s the MRA types who keep saying it’s about what the feminists think about it.

    That what he did is going to have some affect on some other people is undeniably true. The “feminists’ are looking at one group (the people directly affected) and the MRAs are looking to another group… the people they want to be affected.

    Reply
  29. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    hey it’s duncan macleod! 😀 is that a coincidence or did you name yourself after the TV highlander char! 😀 Cuz if so that’s awesome :3 (if not, then it’s awesome you share a name w/ him 😀 )

    Reply
  30. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    Not to defend Marcotte (I know some ppl seem to think she’s like our goddess or something but I’ve mentioned alrdy that I dislike her) but I find it amusing that a comment above did the “the man is a rational being not driven by emotions but calculations” and “the woman is vain and emotional” and attributed motivations to each thru that lens xD it could just be coincidence I know, but it still amuses me xD (and b4 I get “WELL YOU DO THAT” I haven’t said nething about either person xD I have far too many biases here at play, plus I dun like psychoanalyzing suicide : )

    Reply
  31. Snowy says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    “you know the disturbing part …… all the focus by feminists seems to be on the idea that the ex wifes life was made hell why ?? she is his ex wife, the only life of interest is the childs, using this as a way of turning a woman into a victim is an innefective tool and somewhat offensive.”

    There can be only one!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  32. mediumdave says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:26 pm

    Toysoldier is here! Damn, this incident has really struck a nerve…

    bekabot, what you said makes a lot of sense, although I would argue that revenge against his ex-wife and his daughter could’ve still been a secondary motive. Perhaps the self-aggrandizing impulse is the thing that makes the difference between an ordinary crank and a Thomas Ball or Joseph Stack.

    Reply
  33. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:27 pm

    Who is toysoldier? :O is he famous? 😀 should I get to know him better? :3

    Reply
  34. duncan macleod says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    Ami , its a coincidence, although i am 6 foot 2 long haired and scottish lol

    Reply
  35. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    @Snowy

    HEREEEE WE AREEEEE

    BORN TO BE KINGS

    We’re the princes of the universe!

    Reply
  36. VoiP says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    hey it’s duncan macleod!

    No it’s not; there can be only one.

    you know the disturbing part …… all the focus by feminists seems to be on the idea that the ex wifes life was made hell why ?? she is his ex wife, the only life of interest is the childs, using this as a way of turning a woman into a victim is an innefective tool and somewhat offensive.

    How is it disturbing and offensive? Why is it ineffective? Please explain.

    Ball killed himself over (among other things) a dispute he and his ex were having, in a flamboyantly violent fashion, and you don’t think it would be normal that she would be bothered by it?

    also, it’s hilarious that the ex wife is relevant when Women! and The System! are oppressing Ball, and not relevant when we’re talking about who might be saddened and disturbed by Ball’s actions.

    Reply
  37. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:30 pm

    @duncan macleod that’s cool tho! 😀 unless you hate it cuz you’re tired of ppl like me telling you how cool that is xD are you good at sword fighting? 😀

    Reply
  38. duncan macleod says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:38 pm

    classic show

    Reply
  39. Johnny Pez says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:44 pm

    I was kinda hoping for Methos, but you can never tell when he’ll show up.

    Reply
  40. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    I love Methos! He was me and my sister’s fav char by far 😀 he shows up on so much else Canadian filmed sci fi too and whenever he does I’m like, hay it’s Methos! 😀

    Reply
  41. mediumdave says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:51 pm

    Who is toysoldier? :O is he famous?

    In certain circles, yeah. But my surprise was because a) I didn’t think this story was up his alley (he is, or claims to be, an advocate for male survivors of abuse) and b) he’s commented here very infrequently.

    Reply
  42. duncan macleod says:
    June 28, 2011 at 5:52 pm

    lol actually i do fence and am a member of the klan ( the non racist one ) that does reenactments

    Reply
  43. VoiP says:
    June 28, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    [Toysoldier] is, or claims to be, an advocate for male survivors of abuse)

    That makes his handwaving around the issue of Ball hitting his daughter even nastier. So what is it, Toysoldier: is it less bad when a little girl gets hit?

    Reply
  44. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 6:06 pm

    this isn’t questioning you or accusing you or nething :] I’m genuinely curious (and lacking in knowledge) :] I didn’t know there were klans that start with a k that aren’t racist o:

    Reply
  45. duncan macleod says:
    June 28, 2011 at 6:08 pm

    depends on the language used

    Reply
  46. Buck Swamp says:
    June 28, 2011 at 8:07 pm

    Futrelle called “bullshit” on my suggestion that Marcotte was opposed to the presumption of innocence for males accused of rape. That really surprised me that he would argue about that. Anyway, this from Wikipedia:

    Statements on Duke Lacrosse CaseReason contributing editor Cathy Young has described Marcotte as a “leader of the cyber-lynch mob in the Duke University rape hoax”. In “Marcotte’s eyes, the real crime of the ‘independent feminists’ is helping preserve the idea that the presumption of innocence applies even in cases of rape and sexual assault.”[15]

    Marcotte declared on her blog that people who defended the wrongly accused Duke students were “rape-loving scum”.[16] Time reported that in “late January, more ethics charges were heaped on the District Attorney in the Duke University sexual-assault case, and Marcotte attacked the news with her usual swagger and sarcasm:”[17]

    As for my statement that the feminized state could not last forever, I am not calling for armed revolution. Far from it. That would just give the state an excuse to kill and imprison even more men. Instead, I simply believe as more and more men realize they have no stake in supporting the state, more and more of them will withdraw that support. Matriarchy is inherently unsustainable–women as a whole are simply too weak and incompetent to govern without male support.

    Oh, by the way, I’m a misogynist: I have a very low opinion of women’s abilities compared with men’s. If that offends you, too bad.

    Reply
  47. Snowy says:
    June 28, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    “Oh, by the way, I’m a misogynist: I have a very low opinion of women’s abilities compared with men’s.”

    Wow, really? Good thing you said something because I never would have figured that out otherwise.

    Reply
  48. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    As for my statement that the feminized state could not last forever, I am not calling for armed revolution. Far from it. That would just give the state an excuse to kill and imprison even more men.

    I’m actually glad somebody realized this. xD

    Like that guy who was saying that if MRAs started to pick off police responding to DV calls w/ a high powered rifle, the police would just never respond again… um… no, that’s not what would happen xD

    Reply
  49. Ami Angelwings says:
    June 28, 2011 at 8:21 pm

    I have abs no problem w/ the “we’re taking our ball and going home” guys either, I mean ideally, I would like a society where everybody participates and is happy, but I mean if you’re unhappy, that’s a good way to protest (like taking your business elsewhere) :3 I mean if they’re right, society will crumble and women will be lost… and if we’re right and the world is not a feminist dominated matriarchy, then… it won’t crumble :] but this is a good way to handle things vs rawr VIOLENCE! or etc :]

    Reply
  50. Molly Ren says:
    June 28, 2011 at 8:34 pm

    @ithiliana

    “I’ve been concerned over the years with what I believe is a fairly small martyr impulse in feminism, especially in literary feminisms around Virginia Woolf and Sylvia Plath–an impulse toward making them martyrs of the patriarchy.”

    Damn, people do that? I haven’t read so much of Plath as I have of Woolf, but I never got that impression. They always seemed more like cautionary tales about depression going untreated. : /

    Reply
  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. 8
  11. 9
  12. »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Donate to the Mammoth!

We Hunted the Mammoth is an ad-free, reader-supported publication written and published by longtime journalist David Futrelle, who has been tracking, dissecting, and mocking the growing misogynistic backlash since 2010, exposing the hateful ideologies of Men’s Rights Activists, incels, alt-rightists and many others.

We depend on support from people like you. Please consider a donation or a monthly pledge by clicking below! there's no need for a PayPal account.

1
Send comments, questions, and tips for stories to me at dfutrelle@gmail.com, or by clicking here

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • We Hunted the Mammoth Pledge Drive! End of the Decade Edition
  • Don’t go on a meditation retreat with this guy
  • Women laughing in groups without salad: A new reason to hate the ladies?
  • Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about
  • Incels are now mad at the Buddha for being a tall, thin “gigachad”
  • Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre

Top Posts

  • Women laughing in groups without salad: A new reason to hate the ladies?
  • Incels are now mad at the Buddha for being a tall, thin "gigachad"
  • Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about
  • Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift's eggs. But he's been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.

Archives

My Twitter

Tweets by DavidFutrelle

Recent Comments

  • Paireon December 13, 2019 at 11:47 pm on Incels are now mad at the Buddha for being a tall, thin “gigachad”
  • Monday Middlemarch December 13, 2019 at 11:37 pm on Don’t go on a meditation retreat with this guy
  • David Futrelle December 13, 2019 at 11:35 pm on We Hunted the Mammoth Pledge Drive! End of the Decade Edition
  • Mish of the Catlady Ascendancy December 13, 2019 at 11:10 pm on Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about
  • Definitely not Steve December 13, 2019 at 11:03 pm on Don’t go on a meditation retreat with this guy
  • Anonymous December 13, 2019 at 10:56 pm on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Sophy Cooper December 13, 2019 at 10:53 pm on Don’t go on a meditation retreat with this guy
  • Naglfar December 13, 2019 at 10:52 pm on Don’t go on a meditation retreat with this guy

Random WHTM Posts!

  • The Top Five Most Ridiculously Ironic #GamerGate MemesThe Top Five Most Ridiculously Ironic #GamerGate MemesNovember 6, 2014
  • The Parable of the Cupcakes and the Male SpacesThe Parable of the Cupcakes and the Male SpacesApril 21, 2015
  • MGTOWs have curiously strong feelings about Jim and Pam from The OfficeMGTOWs have curiously strong feelings about Jim and Pam from The OfficeNovember 11, 2019
  • Attila vs the Lynch Mob Cult Savages: A Case Study in Twitter "Activism"Attila vs the Lynch Mob Cult Savages: A Case Study in Twitter "Activism"February 17, 2015
  • Roosh's Revenge Fantasy: The pickup artist and Gawker-media-hater writes a short story about the murder of an SJW bloggerRoosh's Revenge Fantasy: The pickup artist and Gawker-media-hater writes a short story about the murder of an SJW bloggerFebruary 12, 2015

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: