• Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← >Female action heroes: An abomination
>On Strike. Also: kitties. →

>Body heat

 April 11, 2011
  · 46 Comments

>

Jayne Mansfield leaks sex onto Sophia Loren
Be careful, gals. With warmer weather coming, don’t be tempted to wear skimpier clothes. Because female sexuality works the same as body heat on a cold winter’s day: the more skin you show, the more heat – literal and figurative – leaks out. Eventually, you will run out. And that’s bad news, possibly for you, and definitely for your future husbands. (And really, they’re the only ones who count.) 
That, in any case, is the theory of one traditional-minded Men’s Rightser calling himself Alucin. In a blog post today he mused about the differences between traditional religious women and, you know, all those filthy “western” sluts wandering around exposing sexy bits like their legs and their … hair. (Not their leg hair, their head hair. We’ll get to leg hair in a minute.) Alucin writes: 

Orthodox Jewish [and]  Muslim women [cover] their hair and other parts when in public. The ideal is that they save their sexuality for their husband. Only their husband can see their hair, legs, cleavage, and experience their sexuality. 
All well and good, Alucin says. “Western women,” by contrast, 
fully display their sexuality, and tend not to value virginity or other traditional sexual morals. Then, when married, they turn into dowdy, asexual androids, gaining weight and wearing their man’s clothes. And forgetting to shave.

They give none of their sexuality to their husbands. It has already been used up. She says that she owns her sexuality, but in fact it was the zillion guys she’s been with who have owned her sexuality. Her sexuality has been farmed and mined.

A western woman’s sexuality is for everyone but her husband. 

  
Here’s one of those horrible hair-showing western harlots singing about hot cleavage in the summertime. (Just so you don’t get too confused by the lyrics, I’m pretty sure the song is from the point of view of a guy missing his girlfriend.)


— 
If you enjoyed this post, would you kindly use the “Share This” or one of the other buttons below to share it on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, or wherever else you want. I appreciate it. 


Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: I'm totally being sarcastic, MRA, reactionary bullshit, sex, Uncategorized, western women suck
← >Female action heroes: An abomination
>On Strike. Also: kitties. →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Jeanette says:
    April 11, 2011 at 10:55 pm

    >Dowdy asexual androids? But I thought the androids were super sexy replacements for the real women that will be obsolete in the next ten years….this is so confusing.

    Reply
  2. Nahida says:
    April 11, 2011 at 10:56 pm

    >Orthodox Jewish [and] Muslim women [cover] their hair and other parts when in public. The ideal is that they save their sexuality for their husband. Oh STFU. The ideal is that we save our sexuality for GOD. Get the fuck over yourself. KTHXBIE.

    Reply
  3. calico says:
    April 11, 2011 at 10:58 pm

    >This is unrelated, but I thought you might get a laugh. Scott Adams wasn't being too original with his "social experiment" http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/resources/mirror-derailing-for-dummies/#surprise

    Reply
  4. Sophia X says:
    April 11, 2011 at 11:01 pm

    >Poor Sophia Loren. Caught in an understandable moment of distraction, forever associated with snippy disapproval.I'm really amused by the idea of my sexuality being strip mined. I say that as an old whore who has always dressed modestly precisely because I don't like strange men to have a better idea of how pretty I look naked. Fuck you, strange men. That really does belong to me and I control who knows about it.

    Reply
  5. Elizabeth says:
    April 11, 2011 at 11:20 pm

    >It brings to mind a question I always had with the concept of honour-why does women's honour have to be from her lady parts?

    Reply
  6. Tom says:
    April 11, 2011 at 11:57 pm

    >The vast majority of Western women are not, in fact, asexual. Approximately 1% of the population may be asexual, and it's not something you become, it's an orientation like any other.Oh, and I may just be a confused ace, but I've always understood most men find it rather sexy when their wives wear their clothes– at least their shirts.

    Reply
  7. briget says:
    April 12, 2011 at 12:14 am

    >tom, my bf moans (in a good way, trust me I know the difference between the happy moan and the unhappy moan) when he sees me wandering around his place in his clothes. If that's not a sign of this turns me on I seriously don't know what is

    Reply
  8. triplanetary says:
    April 12, 2011 at 1:02 am

    >It has already been used up. She says that she owns her sexuality, but in fact it was the zillion guys she's been with who have owned her sexuality. Her sexuality has been farmed and mined.Ah, so sex is a resource and women are nothing but the soil from which that resource is mined. The man's experience of sex is the only one that matters.I've been reading a lot of conservative/sexist drivel today and I'm about ready to throw up.Oh, and I may just be a confused ace, but I've always understood most men find it rather sexy when their wives wear their clothes– at least their shirts. I know I find it adorable. Slash sexy. Adorable and sexy go hand in hand for me. Along with nerdy.Anyway, enough about my sexual tastes.

    Reply
  9. joyce says:
    April 12, 2011 at 1:29 am

    >Now see, I've always thought it should be the other way around. Men should cover themselves up completely. They walk around with their privates pressing against their pants, especially when some men are getting on in years and are wearing boxers it ends up hanging halfway to their knees.

    Reply
  10. Feyline says:
    April 12, 2011 at 3:04 am

    >"The vast majority of Western women are not, in fact, asexual. Approximately 1% of the population may be asexual, and it's not something you become, it's an orientation like any other."Silly Tom. Women's sexuality exists entirely in terms of men's perception and acknowledgment of it. As soon as women are no longer sexually appealing (because all men everywhere have the exact same sexual tastes) we're no longer sexual. After all, we ladies don't have any sex drive of our own to begin with! We just use sex to entrap men with our mystical genitals, and possibly get pregnant so we can financially rape the father for the next 18 years or abort the thing for no other reason than because we're heartless bitches like that.*drowns in sarcasm*

    Reply
  11. Captain Bathrobe says:
    April 12, 2011 at 4:45 am

    >Just more evidence that it's a short walk from these guys to honor killings. They'd feel right at home amongst the Taliban.It's also yet another piece of evidence that the MRM is just plain old fashioned male chauvinism by another name.And, in response to the inevitable "but…but, we're not all like that!": yes, you are.

    Reply
  12. ginmar says:
    April 12, 2011 at 5:05 am

    >Aren't Muslim men supposed to be modest as well? I remember being offended by one otherwise friendly guy at the market place who wouldn't look me in the eye. Later on, one of the others explained it to me: because obviously I didn't veil, he was being modest for me, in a way, by averting his eyes. I was shocked. OMG, a man picking up his share of the load? And if the ladybits are where the character resides, that's one of the most useless theories ever. Captain, it's new and special because they're Western. Or something. They can do the same thing, say the same words, but….they'll protest till the end of time that they're special shiny snowflakes.

    Reply
  13. Avicenna says:
    April 12, 2011 at 6:36 am

    >There is an actual concept called "The Western Woman" which is a strawman constructed by people in eastern cultures to explain why women's rights are not a good thing. Basically the western woman is "A giant slut". The entire MRA argument about women is her MO. She is a harlot clad in scanty clothes and festooned with jewellery. A painted jezebel who exist solely to either dominate men (using her hypnobreasts) or to encourage them to rape her thereby gaining some satisfaction of that. It's basically a horrific stereotype used to dominate women. The logic is that educated women will dress like Paris Hilton and not want to do any work around the house and instead want tiny dogs and to make internet sex tapes. It seriously boils down to that. Eastern women are "chaste" and Western ones are "easy sluts". This nonsense is victorian, it's the exact same reason as why women were kept away from society back then.

    Reply
  14. grammatolatry says:
    April 12, 2011 at 10:26 am

    >i'm still stuck on the idea that sexuality is something concrete that can be seen, displayed, saved, mined, and even farmed. maybe mine fell off somewhere along the way, because i don't think i have one of those.also when did virginity become a moral? i thought it was a state of being. me and my silly lady-brain!

    Reply
  15. DarkSideCat says:
    April 12, 2011 at 12:03 pm

    >Her husband? Wait, don't some women *gasp* never marry or divorce? Shit, ladies, don't you understand that you should not lower your property value before the transfer is completed between your father and your husband? What do you think you are people or something? On a more serious note, wearing a binder in the spring is so very hot. I hate the heat and I always have. I need to find a new cloth hand fan to cool myself with, as everyone else seems to like their spaces warmer than I do and my last one broke.

    Reply
  16. triplanetary says:
    April 12, 2011 at 12:42 pm

    >Later on, one of the others explained it to me: because obviously I didn't veil, he was being modest for me, in a way, by averting his eyes. I was shocked. OMG, a man picking up his share of the load?Still sexism, but at least intellectually consistent sexism. Although I don't respect the tradition at play there, I respect the individual in this case more than I otherwise would.

    Reply
  17. triplanetary says:
    April 12, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    >Okay, I can't ignore this any longer.Is that Jayne Mansfield's nipple, or just a shadow?

    Reply
  18. Hide and Seek says:
    April 12, 2011 at 1:45 pm

    >A zillion . . . really? How many zeros does a zillion have?

    Reply
  19. bathorie says:
    April 12, 2011 at 3:56 pm

    >Avicenna: My favourite part of that "Western Woman" they always talk about is that it never ever ever includes Latinas. The American western woman is an ugly slut, but the Brazilian western woman is the sexy-yet-traditional girl of their dreams. The amount of projection and ignorance is really astounding.

    Reply
  20. triplanetary says:
    April 12, 2011 at 4:35 pm

    >Those non-white women sure do know their place. Except when Egyptians and Libyans revolt, in which case it's because they're courageous MRAs standing up against the femocracy.The best part about MRAs is that not only do they hold multiple contradictory viewpoints, but all of those viewpoints are wrong and equally sexist!

    Reply
  21. Captain Bathrobe says:
    April 12, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    >Avicenna,I'm envisioning a Giant Slut with Hypnobreasts. Sounds like a new female superhero…

    Reply
  22. Avicenna says:
    April 12, 2011 at 6:17 pm

    >That sounds like a pokemon. A Wild Slut has appeared. Wild Slut uses Hypnobreasts. You are confused. You hurt yourself in your confusion…I think that makes as much sense as the next. http://www.odemagazine.com/doc/6/size_six_the_western_women_s_harem/An interesting article of perspective from a Moroccan feminist about western misogyny from a eastern perspective. (I figured you guys will appreciate it more!)

    Reply
  23. SallyStrange says:
    April 12, 2011 at 8:34 pm

    >Can't wait for victor to come back and explain how the concept of street harassment is really a smokescreen for "criminalizing courtship," because apparently his idea of courtship involves making threats of physical harm, blocking a woman's way, or getting his dick out of his pants and waving it around.

    Reply
  24. Captain Bathrobe says:
    April 12, 2011 at 8:37 pm

    >SallyStrange said… Can't wait for victor to come back and explain how the concept of street harassment is really a smokescreen for "criminalizing courtship," because apparently his idea of courtship involves making threats of physical harm, blocking a woman's way, or getting his dick out of his pants and waving it around.Hey, now, those are just guys with poor social skills. If Brad Pitt waved his dick at you, you'd like it, right?sarcasm, in case it isn't obvious.

    Reply
  25. triplanetary says:
    April 12, 2011 at 8:46 pm

    >If Brad Pitt waved his dick at you, you'd like it, right?I might…Of course I can say from experience that, as a man, being harassed on the street isn't anything like it is for women. I've been harassed by gay guys on the street a couple times, and it ranged from amusing to annoying, but I never felt threatened, because the power/privilege imbalance is totally different than it is for women and men.

    Reply
  26. SallyStrange says:
    April 12, 2011 at 9:10 pm

    >Triplanetary,That's you. The most rabid homophobes experience a huge amount of fear over this–usually without ever recognizing the parallels between the treatment they are objecting to, and the treatment women are expected to put up with, without complaining, on a more or less daily basis. As for Brad Pitt… when are we going to settle on a more up-to-date heartthrob guy to star in all our street harassment fantasy scenarios? Brad Pitt is, like, old and stuff, and he has about 38 children. One of my personal favorites is Naveen Andrews (played Saeed on "Lost"). I also like Daniel Craig. But that's just my personal style. Those guys are also a little bit old, and they appeal to me because I'm no longer a teenybopper either, like I was back in the day when Brad Pitt was the hottest thing ever. What about the dude who's playing Thor in the upcoming movie? That guy is pretty much the definition of a hunka hunka burning love. What's his name again?

    Reply
  27. triplanetary says:
    April 12, 2011 at 9:45 pm

    >That's you. The most rabid homophobes experience a huge amount of fear over this–usually without ever recognizing the parallels between the treatment they are objecting to, and the treatment women are expected to put up with, without complaining, on a more or less daily basis. Sure, but women who object to street harassment aren't objecting to the very existence of heterosexual men. Homophobes act like being hit on by a gay man in any situation, whether threatening or not, is an affront to their manly penis.Besides, the threat of the situation is reversed. Women really are threatened by men who harass. But statistically, a gay man has far more to fear from a straight man than vice versa. Reacting as if the gay man is automatically a threat is the same as white people who cross the street when there's a black man approaching.

    Reply
  28. SallyStrange says:
    April 12, 2011 at 10:16 pm

    >Sure, but women who object to street harassment aren't objecting to the very existence of heterosexual men. Homophobes act like being hit on by a gay man in any situation, whether threatening or not, is an affront to their manly penis.True. I was actually thinking of some specific conversations I've had with hetero men who specifically admitted to feeling homophobic. I asked them directly what made them so uncomfortable about the idea of, say, going to a bar where gays are known to congregate occasionally (no bona fide gay bars in my town at this moment) and their responses were:-don't like being hit on when they're not interested-don't like having to say "no" over and over again, don't like it when the "no" is ignored-don't like being seen/treated as a piece of meat rather than a person with individual wishes and desiresAt which point I burst out laughing and was like, "Welcome to my world!" I mean, it does happen that gay guys hit insistently on men they find attractive. I've seen it happen with my own boyfriend when we went to the drag ball. But it's also true, what you say, that this insistence is pretty much the worst thing they could possibly have to deal with, and is nowhere near as threatening as the actual threat of physical and/or sexual violence faced by women, gays and lesbians, and ESPECIALLY transgendered men and women.

    Reply
  29. Elizabeth says:
    April 12, 2011 at 10:54 pm

    >Off topic but Cosmo is more evil then I thought.

    Reply
  30. Johnny Pez says:
    April 13, 2011 at 3:34 am

    >I'm envisioning a Giant Slut with Hypnobreasts. Sounds like a new female superhero…Or maybe not so new.

    Reply
  31. Avicenna says:
    April 13, 2011 at 4:11 am

    >@ElizabethRead the original articles. It calls out men for "putting their hands in their pockets" and "not being fazed".I believe Cosmo is pretty much the equivalent of FHM or Maxim or any of the men's magazines. Good for a laugh (I will hold my hand up and say that I used to read both.) but if you did anything written in there you would probably get arrested.

    Reply
  32. Elizabeth says:
    April 13, 2011 at 5:37 am

    >Oh good lord…do they have to give fodder to the MRAs?

    Reply
  33. Avicenna says:
    April 13, 2011 at 8:36 am

    >Yes… Yes they do. Just like how FHM and Maxim encourage the idiot behaviour of men to women. It goes both ways (Just go read Askmen's advice columns and try to stifle any laughter from the advice.)

    Reply
  34. Elizabeth says:
    April 13, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    >Laughter is good. It keeps you from going bonkers in this crazy ol' world.Then again, I have always known my sense of humour was juvenile as I find 1,000 Ways to Die amusing.

    Reply
  35. Captain Bathrobe says:
    April 13, 2011 at 5:14 pm

    >It seems that a good many MRAs conflate Cosmo with feminism. In vain do we protest that they couldn't be more wrong.

    Reply
  36. triplanetary says:
    April 13, 2011 at 7:06 pm

    >Cosmo is one of the worst products of contemporary patriarchy. MRAs think it's feminist because they don't understand that the patriarchy doesn't seek to erase women, it seeks to actively engage them in their own oppression.In today's world that means dressing up patriarchal complicity as some kind of vapid "you go grrrl" liberation.

    Reply
  37. Captain Bathrobe says:
    April 13, 2011 at 9:04 pm

    >To them, everything bad is feminism and everything feminist is bad.

    Reply
  38. Lady Victoria von Syrus says:
    April 14, 2011 at 12:46 am

    >Sorry for the triple posting, comment fail. http://www.odemagazine.com/doc/6/size_six_the_western_women_s_harem/This is an article written by a woman who was born in a Muslim harem, who compares wearing the burqa and the Western obsession with being the perfect size six. In her mind, there is no difference, since they are both ways to control and contain women.

    Reply
  39. Avicenna says:
    April 14, 2011 at 7:14 am

    >Hey! I posted that first! *Shakes fist*! Curse you Lady!!! *Shakes fist harder!*The woman is pretty famous in muslim feminist circles from what I recall. She has a couple of interesting books if you can find them.

    Reply
  40. ginmar says:
    April 18, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    >Cosmo is just "The Total Woman" with Spanx substituted for the Saran Wrap. Does anybody but MRAs read it?

    Reply
  41. belledame222 says:
    April 18, 2011 at 8:38 pm

    >Holly Pervocracy does, but strictly for the lulz, as it should be.

    Reply
  42. janipurr says:
    March 18, 2014 at 1:24 am

    I realize that this is like 3 years too late, but I wanted to take the opportunity to point out to our good MRA Alucin up there that us fat, lazy, married “Western Women” don’t *ever* “forget” to shave. No, every fall we greet winter with open arms, in the hope that *this* year we can finally grow that leg hair long enough to braid! Only speaking for myself, of course. (cough)

    And, yes, it does appear that Jayne Mansfield is flashing her right nipple. I do believe that’s why Sophia is giving her the side-eye.

    Reply
  43. kittehserf says:
    March 18, 2014 at 1:40 am

    ::snorfle::

    First necro ever worth reading!

    Reply
  44. katz says:
    March 18, 2014 at 1:45 am

    First necro ever worth reading!

    Srsly.

    Everyone take note: It is acceptable to post in a three-year-old thread if you have something this worthwhile to say. (I am not being facetious here.)

    Reply
  45. cloudiah says:
    March 18, 2014 at 10:47 am

    THIS is how necroing is done!

    Welcome, janipurr.

    Reply
  46. Catherine P. says:
    July 11, 2016 at 9:40 am

    Regina Spektor, she is a blessing, I’ve always really liked her. On the Radio this is one of my favorite Regina songs

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Donate to the Mammoth!

We Hunted the Mammoth is an ad-free, reader-supported publication written and published by longtime journalist David Futrelle, who has been tracking, dissecting, and mocking the growing misogynistic backlash since 2010, exposing the hateful ideologies of Men’s Rights Activists, incels, alt-rightists and many others.

We depend on support from people like you. Please consider a donation or a monthly pledge by clicking below! there's no need for a PayPal account.

1
Send comments, questions, and tips for stories to me at dfutrelle@gmail.com, or by clicking here

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • Women laughing in groups without salad: A new reason to hate the ladies?
  • Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about
  • Incels are now mad at the Buddha for being a tall, thin “gigachad”
  • Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre
  • Banning abortion “is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner,” Red Pill Redditor declares
  • I read this incel “field report” and now you have to, too

Top Posts

  • Incels are now mad at the Buddha for being a tall, thin "gigachad"
  • Women laughing in groups without salad: A new reason to hate the ladies?
  • Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift's eggs. But he's been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about

Archives

My Twitter

Tweets by DavidFutrelle

Recent Comments

  • Mish of the Catlady Ascendancy December 13, 2019 at 5:36 am on Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about
  • Paireon December 13, 2019 at 4:58 am on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Naglfar December 13, 2019 at 4:54 am on Women laughing in groups without salad: A new reason to hate the ladies?
  • Naglfar December 13, 2019 at 4:49 am on Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about
  • opposablethumbs December 13, 2019 at 4:26 am on Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about
  • Full Metal Ox December 13, 2019 at 3:09 am on Women laughing in groups without salad: A new reason to hate the ladies?
  • galanx December 13, 2019 at 2:24 am on Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about
  • Ucalegont December 13, 2019 at 2:01 am on Open Thread on the UK elections and anything else you want to talk about

Random WHTM Posts!

  • Vectorman vs The Space LibbersVectorman vs The Space LibbersJanuary 7, 2012
  • Bannedit? Two days after banning alt-right MillionDollarExtreme subreddit, Reddit nukes its QAnon forumBannedit? Two days after banning alt-right MillionDollarExtreme subreddit, Reddit nukes its QAnon forumSeptember 12, 2018
  • POLL: “It only gets worse,” and other totally inspiring MGTOW slogansPOLL: “It only gets worse,” and other totally inspiring MGTOW slogansJune 14, 2016
  • Man Boobz Super Fun Time Video Party 2: Take the StairsJuly 27, 2011
  • Remember Sargon’s dopey petition? Hbomberguy offers his belated yet hilarious responseAugust 1, 2016

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: