• Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← >Rapists are apparently being oppressed by the term “rapist.”
>Boycott? Make that a MANcott! →

Applied Slutonomics: The Vaginal Supply Curve

 December 28, 2010
  · 17 Comments

 

Vaginal supply and demand.

Apparently sluts aren’t simply, you know, dirty whores. They’re also sadly lacking a real work ethic. And no wonder, because sluttery is evidently as easy as falling off a log. Onto a bed. Naked. At least according to someone calling himself Reality 2010 on The Spearhead’s message boards.

[I]t takes tremendous effort and or a tremendous talent or a god-given gift to be a ‘stud’ while it takes absolutely zero effort to be a slut. All it takes for a woman to be a slut is to just lie on her back. Wow. What an achievement. 

Sluts are apparently also in need of a refresher course in economics. They don’t appear to understand the basics of supply and demand. By giving away their pussy too readily to too many men, they are decreasing its value!

There’s also the fact that a woman’s vagina/body is her one and only asset – (as if you would actually want a woman based on her petty, lazy, confrontational and flaky personality or parasitical worthlessness in the workplace) so to mindlessly give away the one and only thing you have of any value has a much broader pathetic implication than that of gender & sex regardless of whatever it is.

As you can see from the helpful diagram here, increasing the supply of vagina — that is, moving the vagina supply curve from S0 to S1 — both decreases the price of vagina and increases the amount of vagina consumed, bringing us to a new slutquilibrium.

I mean, come on, ladies, that’s pretty basic Slutonomics.

It’s a good thing that vagina is a renewable resource, or else we’d all be fucked. Figuratively, not literally.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: I'm totally being sarcastic, misogyny, sex, sluts, the spearhead, Uncategorized
← >Rapists are apparently being oppressed by the term “rapist.”
>Boycott? Make that a MANcott! →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pam says:
    December 28, 2010 at 8:20 pm

    >There’s also the fact that a woman’s vagina/body is her one and only asset – (as if you would actually want a woman based on her petty, lazy, confrontational and flaky personality or parasitical worthlessness in the workplace) so to mindlessly give away the one and only thing you have of any value…Whew! I'm so relieved to see that MRAs aren't woman-haters who think that women are useless and worthless (save for their precious vaginas or their bodies), unlike those nasty feminazi man-haters who think that men are useless and worthless (save for their precious wallets or their sperm)!!!

    Reply
  2. ScareCrow says:
    December 28, 2010 at 8:46 pm

    >@Pam:Glad to hear you think that not all MRA's are woman-haters.

    Reply
  3. Pam says:
    December 28, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    >@ScareCrow,Oh, I don't think that all MRAs are woman-haters. What is unfortunate, though, is that the ones who obviously aren't, more often than not, end up being denigrated for not indulging in women-bashing (figuratively speaking). One good example that I can think of right off the top is someone named Kave who infrequently posts comments at The Spearhead.And yes, I do realize that your reply to me was a sarcasm, just as you realized same for my comment.

    Reply
  4. David Futrelle says:
    December 28, 2010 at 10:07 pm

    >FWIW, this attitude is pretty common on The Spearhead. Last I checked, this comment had 56 upvotes and only 3 downvotes.

    Reply
  5. Jadehawk says:
    December 28, 2010 at 11:07 pm

    >see, shit like this is precisely why it "takes tremendous effort/talent to be a stud"but go ahead, men, keep on shooting yourself in the foot and denigrating women who like sex.***comment obviously does not apply to voluntarily celibate MRA's, who in any case shouldn't give a fuck about the supply of vagina, since they have no demand for it***

    Reply
  6. ScareCrow says:
    December 28, 2010 at 11:30 pm

    >@PamReally – you were being sarcastic?Seriously?So, were you being sarcastic in that second post too? So you thnk that ALL MRA's are woman-haters – and you think my reply was NOT sarcasm – and Kave is actually a BAD example of a bad commenter on the spear-head?Whew!

    Reply
  7. Pam says:
    December 29, 2010 at 12:44 am

    >@Jadehawk,But, buried within the original topic from which David gleaned the comments that he is showcasing here lies the real reason that these men denigrate women who like sex, "…just as women nowadays are free to be as promiscuous as the alpha males they wish to emulate". You see women who like sex don't actually like sex, they are simply emulating males; and not just any males, oh no, they're emulating the much-despised (though daresay I think it's much-envied) ALPHA males.

    Reply
  8. M says:
    December 29, 2010 at 1:52 am

    >"There’s also the fact that a woman’s vagina/body is her one and only asset"Ahahaha great use of the word "fact" here. Clearly this individual is missing that most vital asset known as a "working brain."

    Reply
  9. Dr. Deezee says:
    December 29, 2010 at 3:08 am

    >You didn't follow the paper trail very well on this one, David. You could at least give deference to the originator (27 September 2001): http://www.the-niceguy.com/articles/SupplyDemand.html

    Reply
  10. Eliza Doaslittleaspossible says:
    December 29, 2010 at 9:32 am

    >I know this is a totally pointless comment, but "The Vaginal Supply Curve" would be a pretty awesome band name or album title. (As long as you wanted no mainstream retailer to actually sell your album, I suppose. Dirty, dirty "vagina" and all.)

    Reply
  11. Lucy Montrose says:
    December 29, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    >Very illuminating theory you've found, Manboobz. You know, when a cultural meme persists for as long as slut-shaming has, you know it has to owe its persistence to multiple factors. In most cases, we've already stripped away religious and many societal reasons to slut-shame… and yet it remains, because apparently all the layers of the onion haven't been peeled off yet.So there's a perception that being a stud takes hard work, while being a slut doesn't… I can see where that would definitely plant deep roots in our morality. It fits right in with our Puritan work ethic! How very American.Nice also to see that MRAs see love relationships in terms of financial charts and graphs. Calvinism and balance sheets. That's a recipe for romance right there.

    Reply
  12. Raul Groom says:
    December 29, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    >It's weird reading all of this stuff as a stay at home dad. I'm starting to realize, in this worldview I'm a woman! I don't work, I probably would get the kids if my wife left me, I would get alimony…If my wife ever realizes I don't have a vagina I'm in big, big trouble. I have nothing else of value!

    Reply
  13. ScareCrow says:
    December 29, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    >@David:The new black background – its just so – not – you.

    Reply
  14. Pam says:
    December 29, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    >If my wife ever realizes I don't have a vagina I'm in big, big trouble. I have nothing else of value!And not only that, just wait 'til she realizes that you are a parasite who sits on the couch watching Oprah and eating bon bons all day long, every day!!

    Reply
  15. Raul Groom says:
    December 30, 2010 at 1:25 am

    >I'm actually a parasite who sits on the couch eating bonbons and watching Dexter all day.

    Reply
  16. Pam says:
    December 30, 2010 at 11:23 pm

    >… and watching Dexter all dayExcellent choice!!!

    Reply
  17. Vanessa L. says:
    January 30, 2011 at 11:29 pm

    >for me it would be sitting on the couch watching WOMEN'S sports all day!!!!!!!!!! which would really piss off the old fashioned macho men who think that "girls" sports are just so not any good and so not worth watching.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Donate to the Mammoth!

We Hunted the Mammoth is an ad-free, reader-supported publication written and published by longtime journalist David Futrelle, who has been tracking, dissecting, and mocking the growing misogynistic backlash since 2010, exposing the hateful ideologies of Men’s Rights Activists, incels, alt-rightists and many others.

We depend on support from people like you. Please consider a donation or a monthly pledge by clicking below! there's no need for a PayPal account.

1
Send comments, questions, and tips for stories to me at dfutrelle@gmail.com, or by clicking here

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre
  • Banning abortion “is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner,” Red Pill Redditor declares
  • I read this incel “field report” and now you have to, too
  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • Black athletes are turning white men into a cucked “third sex” by being better at sports, weirdo racist football fan argues
  • Where I’ve been
  • In the battle betwen John Wayne and Mr. Rogers it’s the gentler soul who’s winning
  • Amazon is promoting “racial hate crimes” with a new show featuring Nazi hunters as the heroes, professional mad guy One Angry Gamer declares

Top Posts

  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: "You try to cheat men's brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have"
  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Banning abortion "is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner," Red Pill Redditor declares

Archives

My Twitter

Tweets by DavidFutrelle

Recent Comments

  • Moggie December 9, 2019 at 6:48 am on MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Crip Dyke December 9, 2019 at 5:05 am on MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Naglfar December 9, 2019 at 4:42 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • StaceySmartyPantsTwiceRemoved December 9, 2019 at 12:27 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • epitome of incomprehensibility December 9, 2019 at 12:15 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • galanx December 9, 2019 at 12:13 am on MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • StaceySmartyPantsTwiceRemoved December 9, 2019 at 12:07 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • StaceySmartyPantsTwiceRemoved December 8, 2019 at 11:26 pm on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”

Random WHTM Posts!

  • New incel theory: Gay men are just “beta orbiters” who worship women so much they want to become themNew incel theory: Gay men are just “beta orbiters” who worship women so much they want to become themMarch 25, 2019
  • Supreme Court depression open threadSupreme Court depression open threadJune 27, 2018
  • Open thread for personal stuff: Autumn of our discontent editionOpen thread for personal stuff: Autumn of our discontent editionNovember 29, 2016
  • Turns out there’s a Yahoo! manifesto, tooTurns out there’s a Yahoo! manifesto, tooAugust 6, 2017
  • How to get rave reviews for terrible books, the Matt Forney wayHow to get rave reviews for terrible books, the Matt Forney waySeptember 14, 2013

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: